posted
20/07/10
Imagine if, as a student of filmmaking, you were scoping out film schools, observing the sometimes-astounding cost of tuition for those schools, and then you noticed another program claiming to give you a similar quality education (possibly even better) for a tiny fraction of the cost of the other film schools. Would you think it was a Film Connection scam—that it was too good to be true?
The Film Connection just happens to be in that predicament. Although they are a fully-accredited school, they offer a program that at first glance might seem too good to be true—leaving some people wondering if they are a scam.
However, there’s actually a very reasonable explanation as to why The Film Connection can charge this little and make these claims about their program. It has very little to do with the quality of the content, and almost everything to do with the method by which the student receives the education.
The Film Connection has recognized that filmmaking is part art form and part trade, and that both art and trade are essentially learned by doing. Through the centuries, both artists and artisans have learned their crafts not through formal education, but through mentorship and apprenticeship—by consistent hands-on experience under the tutelage of a professional who took the apprentice under his/her wing. The Film Connection has taken this ancient mentor-apprentice approach and built their entire educational program around it. Rather than remove the students into a separated school environment to learn the curriculum, they have taken their curriculum into the real-world environment, paying seasoned working professionals to mentor students through the curriculum. As you can imagine, this greatly reduces the cost of the education, all the while helping students learn filmmaking in the best way possible: by actually doing it.
It seems too good to be true, simply because it is a completely different approach than competing schools are using. However, it’s difficult to take a time-tested, ancient approach to learning, and label it a Film Connection scam.
If the proof of the pudding is in the eating, then the real test of whether The Film Connection works is in the many students who have come through the program. One film student says this: “A week after I joined the program, I was working on a famous music video which was a great experience. It was my first opportunity with the program and the week following that I was working on a Roger Corman movie which had a budget of about $200,000, and by the time that film was over, I was the second assistant director.”
The mentorship-apprentice approach has been used for centuries for this very reason: it works. If The Film Connection uses this approach so effectively for a fraction of the cost of other film schools, is it really too good to be true? Is it a Film Connection scam? That’s difficult to imagine.
Tweet This Post